Money . Bitcoin . Inflation . Devaluation

​​​

​

​​

​

​​

​

​​

​​

​​

​

​

Money = Inflation = Devaluation

Bitcoin = Deflation = Devaluation

 

​

Bitcoin's Nature:

• Deflationary: Bitcoin's limited supply can lead to price appreciation over time.

• Inflationary: Increased demand for goods and services fuelled by Bitcoin wealth can drive up prices.

• Devaluation: While Bitcoin's limited supply can contribute to price stability, excessive inflation can erode its purchasing power. If the rate of inflation outpaces Bitcoin's appreciation, it will require more Bitcoin to purchase the same goods and services, diminishing its value.

​​​

Purchasing Power:

• If prices of goods and services rise faster than your income (Bitcoin), your purchasing power decreases. In essence, purchasing power is determined by the relationship between income and the cost of living.

• ​When prices for goods and services rise faster than your income (Bitcoin), your purchasing power diminishes. This means you can buy fewer goods and services with the same amount of money (Bitcoin).

​​

 

FIAT = Printing Money --> Increase Purchase Power --> Inflation --> Reduce Purchase Power --> Devaluation

This sequence accurately describes the potential consequences of excessive money printing:

​

1. Printing Money: Governments can increase the money supply by printing more currency or through quantitative easing.  

2. Increase Purchase Power: Initially, this can lead to a temporary boost in purchasing power as people have more money to spend.

3. Inflation: However, as more money chases the same amount of goods and services, prices rise, leading to inflation.  

4. Reduce Purchase Power: As inflation erodes the value of money, people can buy less with the same amount of currency.  

5. Devaluation: In extreme cases, the currency can become significantly devalued, making it less valuable compared to other currencies

​​​​

BITCOIN = Bitcoin Value Rises --> Increase Purchase Power -->  Increase Demand For Goods --> Inflation --> Reduce Purchase Power --> Devaluation

​​​​

While Bitcoin's fixed supply makes it resistant to traditional inflation, its increasing value can indirectly contribute to inflationary pressures in certain contexts. Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood predicts Bitcoin could hit $650,000, with a bull case of $1–1.5 million by 2030.

​

Let see how Bitcoin's rising value can contribute to inflation, devaluation when rate of inflation outpaces Bitcoin's appreciation,:​

​

• Bitcoin Value Rises: As Bitcoin's value rises, individuals holding Bitcoin gain more purchasing power. This can lead to increased demand for goods and services, potentially driving up prices. 

• Increased Purchase Power: As Bitcoin ownership surges, with 25% of Americans currently owning it and projections suggesting 100% by 2033, a significant increase in wealth accumulation is expected in coming decade. This growing financial purchasing power could translate into heightened demand for goods and services. With limited supply to meet this expanding demand, inflationary pressures may arise, potentially driving up prices.

• Increased Institution Government Ownership:  As more of the limited supply of Bitcoin is held by substantial institutional investment (e.g., MicroStrategy), inflows into Bitcoin ETFs, and a global competition to accumulate Bitcoin Strategic Reserve, akin to a "digital gold rush.", less is available for individual investors to purchase. This reduced supply could drive up demand and, consequently, the price.

• Increased Demand For Goods: A thriving Bitcoin market can stimulate economic activity, leading to increased demand for goods and services, which can also contribute to inflation.

• Relative Inflation: If Bitcoin's value appreciates faster than the value of fiat currencies, it can lead to a relative increase in the price of goods and services denominated in fiat currencies. This is because people may be willing to pay more for goods and services if they can use Bitcoin to do so.

• Decline in Purchasing Power:

• a) If the cost of living or the price of goods and services outpaces the appreciation of Bitcoin, the purchasing power of Bitcoin holders could diminish. This means that the same amount of Bitcoin may buy fewer goods and services over time.

• b) Additionally, increased demand for goods and services, driven by the growing number of Bitcoin owners, could intensify competition for resources. This could lead to further price hikes and exacerbate the erosion of purchasing power. In essence, this scenario could lead to a form of inflation, where the value of Bitcoin relative to goods and services decreases.

• Devaluation: While Bitcoin's limited supply can contribute to price stability, excessive inflation can erode its purchasing power. If the rate of inflation outpaces Bitcoin's appreciation, it will require more Bitcoin to purchase the same goods and services, diminishing its value. For instance, if you buy a certain amount of goods with 1 Bitcoin today, you might need more Bitcoin to buy the same amount in the future due to inflation. Conversely, if Bitcoin appreciates faster than inflation, it can maintain or increase its purchasing power

​

Note:

Product Price Decrease: If the deflationary effect of Bitcoin outweighs inflationary pressures, it could lead to a decrease in the overall price level of goods and services.

Product Price Increase: However, if inflationary pressures dominate, it could lead to an increase in prices and a decrease in the purchasing power of Bitcoin.

​

​If the rate of inflation (the increase in the general price level of goods and services) outpaces the rate of Bitcoin's appreciation, then indeed, more Bitcoin will be required to purchase the same goods and services. This would effectively decrease Bitcoin's purchasing power, leading to a form of devaluation.

If the rate of inflation is lower than the rate of Bitcoin's appreciation, then indeed, less Bitcoin will be required to purchase the same goods and services. This would effectively increase Bitcoin's purchasing power.

​

If a sustained period of high inflation occurs and Bitcoin's price doesn't keep pace, it could lead to a decrease in its purchasing power. This scenario is more likely to occur if:

• Central banks continue to print money at an accelerated pace.

• Global economic instability leads to widespread inflation.

• Bitcoin's price fails to keep up with the rising cost of goods and services.

​​​

​​

Bitcoin Deflation: A Real-World Example

​

Bitcoin's limited supply and potential for price appreciation can lead to deflationary effects. In simpler terms, this means that the purchasing power of Bitcoin can increase over time, especially if the overall price level of goods and services rises at a slower rate.

​

Let's illustrate this with a scenario:​

• 2024: 1 Bitcoin is worth $100,000.

• 2027: 1 Bitcoin is worth $370,000. (increase 370%)

​

During this period, let's assume a one-bedroom apartment increases in price from $1,000,000 to $2,700,000. (increase 270%)

 

Initial Cost (2024):

• To buy the apartment in 2024, you'd need approximately 10 Bitcoin ($1,000,000 / $100,000).

 

Future Cost (2027):

• To buy the same apartment in 2027, you'd need only 7.3 Bitcoin ($2,700,000 / $370,000).

 

The Takeaway: Even though the price of the apartment has increased, the number of Bitcoins required to purchase it has actually decreased. This demonstrates how Bitcoin's value has appreciated relative to the asset, highlighting its potential as a store of value and a hedge against inflation.

​​

​

Bitcoin Devaluation: A Real-World Example

​

While Bitcoin's limited supply can help stabilize its value, it's not immune to the effects of inflation. If the overall price level (%) of goods and services rises faster than Bitcoin's price level (%), its purchasing power can erode.

​

Let's consider a scenario:

• 2024: 1 Bitcoin is worth $100,000.

• 2027: 1 Bitcoin is worth $370,000. (increase 370%)

​

During this period, let's assume a one-bedroom apartment increases in price from $1,000,000 to $3,900,000 ( increase 390%).

​

Initial Cost (2024):

• To buy the apartment in 2024, you'd need approximately 10 Bitcoin ($1,000,000 / $100,000).

 

Future Cost (2027):

• To buy the same apartment in 2027, you'd need 10.5 Bitcoin ($3,900,000 / $370,000).

 

The Takeaway: Even though Bitcoin's price has increased, the rising cost (390%) of the apartment has outpaced Bitcoin's appreciation (370%). This means that in terms of purchasing power, Bitcoin has actually decreased in value relative to real estate.

​

In essence, while Bitcoin can be a valuable asset, it's important to consider its purchasing power over time, especially in relation to the rate (%) rise comparison.

​

​​

​

Bitcoin May Loss Its Hedge Against Inflation in 2033

​

We've accurately identified the potential challenges to Bitcoin's role as an inflation hedge in future.

​

If a significant portion of the population holds Bitcoin, government or institutions, such as BlackRock, MicroStrategy and more than 30% of UAE population adopt Bitcoin, or 99% of world population owned BTC by 2033, its price could become more influenced by traditional economic factors like inflation and interest rates in coming years. This could potentially diminish its effectiveness as a hedge against inflation.

​

For example, if the rate of inflation outpaces Bitcoin's appreciation, it will indeed require more Bitcoin to purchase the same goods and services. This would effectively decrease Bitcoin's purchasing power, diminishing its effectiveness as a hedge against inflation.

​​​​

Cost of living is higher eg $5 coffee becomes $50

Standard of living is the same if not higher.

​

​

A Deeper Dive into Bitcoin's Future as an Inflation Hedge

​

If major world powers like the US, China, and the UK were to accumulate a significant portion of the Bitcoin supply, it would have profound implications for the global economy.

 

While Bitcoin has been touted as a hedge against inflation, its effectiveness could be compromised under certain conditions, particularly if widely adopted by governments and institutions worldwide.

​

Key Factors Influencing Bitcoin's Future as an Inflation Hedge:

1. Market Manipulation: Large-scale buying and selling by governments and institutions could manipulate the market, reducing Bitcoin's effectiveness as a hedge.

2. Regulatory Changes: Stricter regulations or bans on cryptocurrency trading could limit its accessibility and impact its price.

3. Technological Advancements: New cryptocurrencies or digital assets with superior features could challenge Bitcoin's dominance.

4. Economic Conditions: Global economic events, such as recessions or geopolitical tensions, could significantly impact Bitcoin's price.

​

The Paradox of Mass Adoption:

Ironically, widespread adoption of Bitcoin could paradoxically weaken its inflation-hedging properties. As more people and institutions invest in Bitcoin, its price becomes more susceptible to traditional economic factors like supply and demand, interest rates, and monetary policy.

​​

​

​

Real-World Example: Real Estate

​

Let's consider a hypothetical scenario:

​

• 2024: You own 1 Bitcoin, worth $70,000 each. With this, you can purchase a modest 1 studio ($70,000) in a specific neighborhood.

• 2030: Due to inflation, the same studio now costs $200,000. However, Bitcoin's value has only doubled to $140,000 each.

• 2030 Problem: To purchase the same studio in 2030, you now need to have 2.85 Bitcoins ($200,000), instead of 1 Bitcoin ($140,000)

​

Why This Happens:

​​

• Inflation Erodes Purchasing Power: As the price level rises, the value of a fixed amount of currency, including Bitcoin, decreases.

• Relative Value: If Bitcoin's value doesn't keep pace with inflation, it becomes less valuable relative to real-world assets like property.

• Bitcoin Price Appreciation: Bitcoin's value increases from $70,000 to $140,000.

• Real Estate Price Appreciation: The price of the 1 studio also increases at a faster rate (285%) than Bitcoin (200%)

• Decreased Purchasing Power: As a result, the number of Bitcoin required to purchase the studio increases, indicating that Bitcoin's purchasing power has declined relative to real estate.

 

In essence, while Bitcoin offers potential for growth, it's crucial to consider the broader economic environment. If inflation outpaces Bitcoin's appreciation, it could lead to a decline in its purchasing power.

​​

In this example, a Bitcoin holder would need to pay more Bitcoin to purchase the same studio in 2030 compared to 2024. This indicates that Bitcoin's purchasing power for real estate has decreased, effectively devaluing BTC relative to real estate assets.

​

​It's important to note that while Bitcoin has the potential to appreciate significantly, it's not immune to the effects of inflation. A diversified investment strategy, including both Bitcoin and traditional assets, can help mitigate the risks associated with potential devaluation.

​

Factors Influencing the Relationship

The relationship between Bitcoin's value, inflation, and devaluation is complex and influenced by various factors, including:

​

• Economic Conditions: Overall economic health, interest rates, and employment levels.

• Government Policies: Monetary and fiscal policies implemented by governments.

• Market Sentiment: Investor confidence and perception of Bitcoin's value.

​​

While Bitcoin's fixed supply makes it resistant to traditional inflation, its increasing value can indirectly contribute to inflationary pressures. The extent of this impact depends on various factors and requires careful analysis. As Bitcoin's role in the global economy continues to evolve, understanding its potential economic implications remains crucial.

​

 

A Refined Analysis of Bitcoin's Role as an Inflation Hedge

​

Bitcoin's Complex Relationship with Inflation

​

While Bitcoin has often been touted as a hedge against inflation, its effectiveness in this role is nuanced and depends on various factors.

 

The Double-Edged Sword of Adoption:

• Increased Demand: As more people and institutions adopt Bitcoin, its demand increases, potentially driving up its price.

• Reduced Hedging Potential: However, widespread adoption can also tie Bitcoin's value more closely to traditional economic factors, such as inflation and interest rates. This could diminish its effectiveness as a hedge against inflation.

 

The Impact of Inflation on Bitcoin's Value:

• Increased Demand: If inflation erodes the purchasing power of traditional currencies, people may turn to Bitcoin as a store of value. This increased demand could drive up Bitcoin's price.

• Decreased Purchasing Power: If Bitcoin's price appreciation doesn't keep pace with inflation, its purchasing power will decline.

 

The Role of DeFi and Stablecoins:

• DeFi's Potential: DeFi platforms can offer innovative financial products and services that could help mitigate the effects of inflation.

• Stablecoins: These cryptocurrencies pegged to fiat currencies can provide a more stable store of value compared to volatile cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.

 

Conclusion:

Bitcoin's role as an inflation hedge is complex and subject to various factors. While it has the potential to be a valuable asset, it's important to consider its limitations and risks. Diversification and a long-term investment horizon are crucial for managing risk and maximizing returns.

 

To summarize, Bitcoin's effectiveness as an inflation hedge is influenced by:

• Market sentiment and adoption rates

• Technological advancements in the blockchain space

• Regulatory environment

• Macroeconomic factors like inflation and interest rates

• The development of DeFi and stablecoin ecosystems

 

By understanding these factors, investors can make informed decisions about their Bitcoin investments.

​

How DeFi Can Mitigate Inflation

​

DeFi, or Decentralized Finance, offers several mechanisms to potentially mitigate the effects of inflation:

​

1. Yield Farming:

   • By staking cryptocurrencies on DeFi platforms, users can earn interest on their holdings. This can help offset the effects of inflation by generating additional income.

2. Lending and Borrowing:

   • DeFi protocols allow users to lend their crypto assets and earn interest. This can provide a stable source of income, especially during periods of high inflation.

3. Stablecoins:

   • Stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies can protect against inflation by maintaining a relatively stable value.

4. Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs):

   • DEXs can provide access to a wider range of assets and trading opportunities, potentially helping users to diversify their portfolios and hedge against inflation.

   • ​

However, it's important to note that DeFi is a relatively new and volatile industry. While it offers potential benefits, it also carries significant risks, including smart contract vulnerabilities, market manipulation, and regulatory uncertainty.

​

Therefore, it's crucial to conduct thorough research and exercise caution when participating in DeFi activities.

​

​--------------------​​​​​​​​​​

​

​

Printing Money

• Increased Purchasing Power: When a government prints more money, it increases the supply of currency in circulation. This can lead to increased purchasing power for individuals and businesses, as they have more money to spend.

• Inflation: If the increase in money supply outpaces the growth of the economy (i.e., the production of goods and services), it can lead to inflation. This is because there is more money chasing the same amount of goods, which drives up prices.

​

Bitcoin Price Appreciation

• Increased Purchasing Power: BTC holdings in publicly traded and private companies, ETFs and countries own 12.108% of total 21 million Bitcoin. As Bitcoin's value rises, people and companies holding Bitcoin have more purchasing power. This can lead to increased demand for goods and services, putting upward pressure on prices.

• Inflation: If the increase in Bitcoin's value is significant enough, it can contribute to inflation in the broader economy, particularly if Bitcoin is widely used as a means of payment.

​​

​

 

Institutional Holdings of Bitcoin: A Growing Trend

 

While Bitcoin's recent price surge may seem like a victory for the cryptocurrency community, it's important to consider the potential implications.

​

The increasing influence of large financial institutions and governments on the Bitcoin market raises concerns about the long-term vision of decentralization. As more Bitcoin is accumulated by centralized entities, it could undermine the core principles of the cryptocurrency and potentially lead to increased price volatility and market manipulation.​ It's crucial to assess whether this trend is truly beneficial for the future of Bitcoin or if it's a step towards a more centralized and controlled financial system.

 

A growing trend of government and institutional adoption has seen entities such as BlackRock, MicroStrategy, and major countries accumulate a significant portion of Bitcoin's supply. As of 2024, these institutions collectively held over 12% of the total 21 million Bitcoin, potentially shaping the cryptocurrency's future trajectory.

 

Some of the key implications of this trend include:

 

• Increased Institutional Adoption: The growing interest from established financial institutions like BlackRock and JP Morgan signals increased legitimacy and potential for mainstream adoption of Bitcoin and Bitcoin ETF. 

• Potential for Market Manipulation: Large holders could potentially manipulate the market through coordinated buying or selling, impacting price movements. 

• Large-scale government purchases of Bitcoin could indeed lead to market manipulation. If major world powers were to accumulate significant portions of the Bitcoin supply, they could potentially influence the price through strategic buying and selling. This could lead to increased volatility and make it difficult for individual investors to predict price movements.

• Additionally, government involvement could introduce regulatory risks. Governments might impose stricter regulations on cryptocurrency trading, which could impact its price and liquidity.

• Reduced Decentralization: The concentration of Bitcoin holdings in the hands of a few entities could reduce the decentralized nature of the cryptocurrency, raising concerns about potential control and censorship.

• Regulatory Scrutiny: Increased institutional involvement may attract greater regulatory scrutiny, which could have both positive and negative consequences for Bitcoin's development.

​

It's important to note that while 12.108% is a significant portion, the majority of Bitcoin's supply is still held by individual investors, ensuring a degree of decentralization. However, the growing influence of institutions is a notable trend to watch in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

​

​The increasing institutional interest in Bitcoin, particularly through ETFs, presents a complex and paradoxical scenario. On one hand, it signifies mainstream acceptance and could potentially drive significant price appreciation. However, it also raises concerns about the potential loss of decentralization, a core tenet of cryptocurrency.

​​​

The Benefits:

• Increased Legitimacy: Institutional investment lends credibility to Bitcoin as an asset class, reducing its perception as a speculative asset.

• Increased Institutional Interest: The growth of Bitcoin ETFs, fueled by cash-and-carry arbitrage, indicates increased institutional interest in Bitcoin as a legitimate investment asset. The use of sophisticated trading strategies like cash-and-carry arbitrage suggests a maturing Bitcoin market with greater liquidity and efficiency.

• Increased Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: Countries like El Salvador, US and Poland adopt Bitcoin's potential as a store of value and a hedge against inflation.

• Price Stability: Large institutions can provide liquidity and stabilize Bitcoin's price, reducing volatility.

• Cash-and-Carry Arbitrage: While cash-and-carry arbitrage has fueled the expansion of Bitcoin ETFs, the fundamental investor interest in Bitcoin persists.

• Regulatory Clarity: Increased institutional interest may drive regulatory clarity, which could foster broader adoption.

• Technological Advancements: Institutional involvement can stimulate innovation and development within the Bitcoin ecosystem.

​

Potential Risks: 

• Centralization: Concentrates power and control in fewer hands. 

• Reduced Decentralization: A significant portion of Bitcoin's supply held by a few large institutions could reduce the network's decentralized nature.

• Market Manipulation: Large institutional holders could potentially manipulate the market by strategically buying or selling large amounts of Bitcoin, influencing its price.

• Cash-and-Carry Arbitrage: While cash-and-carry arbitrage can increase market liquidity, it could also potentially be used to manipulate prices or create artificial demand.

• Regulatory Risks: Increased regulatory scrutiny could lead to stricter rules that hinder Bitcoin's growth.

• Dependency on Centralized Entities: Reliance on custodial services could reduce individual control over Bitcoin holdings.

• Bitcoin Wealth Inequality: Bitcoin can widen the income gap between large and small holders.​

• Insider Trading: Creates opportunities for unfair advantages.

• Front-Running: High-frequency trading firms or individuals with privileged information could potentially profit by front-running large trades.

• Information Asymmetry: If certain individuals or institutions have access to non-public information about Bitcoin's future, they could use this information to their advantage.

• Unproductive asset: Bitcoin ETFs run by Centralized Financial Institutions, which hold your Bitcoin through a centralized exchange like Coinbase, all leading to single point of systemic risks. With $100B locked into an unproductive asset that too in a centralized manner. $100B could have helped the economies generate new business, create jobs and increase trade exports.
   

​

It's crucial to strike a balance between encouraging institutional adoption and preserving Bitcoin's decentralized nature. A healthy ecosystem requires a diverse range of participants, including both individual and institutional investors.

​

​

The Risks of Bitcoin ETFs in Exchanges

​

​

Bitcoin ETFs, managed by centralized financial institutions, such as Blackrock's Bitcoin ETF (IBID) introduce significant risks to investors. By holding Bitcoin through centralized exchanges like Coinbase, these ETFs create a single point of failure.

 

This centralized approach can lead to:

 

• Security Vulnerabilities: Centralized exchanges are susceptible to hacking attacks, which could result in the loss of investor funds.

• Regulatory Risks: Changes in government regulations can impact the operations of these exchanges and the value of the assets they hold.

• Counterparty Risk: If an exchange faces financial difficulties or bankruptcy, investors may lose access to their funds.

 

With billions of dollars locked into these centralized ETFs, there's a missed opportunity to allocate capital to productive sectors of the economy, such as innovation, job creation, and trade.

​

--------------

​​

The Risks of Centralized Bitcoin ETFs

 

Centralized Bitcoin ETFs pose several risks to the broader financial system:

 

• 1. Single Point of Failure: By consolidating Bitcoin holdings into a few centralized entities, these ETFs create a single point of failure. A security breach, regulatory crackdown, or financial insolvency could have significant implications for investors.

• 2. Reduced Decentralization: The core principle of Bitcoin is decentralization. However, centralized ETFs undermine this principle by concentrating ownership and control in the hands of a few institutions.

• 3. Market Manipulation: Large-scale buying and selling by these institutions could potentially manipulate the Bitcoin market, leading to price volatility and unfair market conditions.

• 4. Systemic Risk: If a major ETF were to experience a significant loss or collapse, it could have ripple effects on the broader financial system, particularly if it's highly leveraged or interconnected with other financial institutions.

​

To mitigate these risks, it's crucial to promote decentralized ownership of Bitcoin and to encourage the development of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) eg Uniswap, and custodial solutions. By empowering individuals to hold their own Bitcoin, we can strengthen the network's resilience and reduce the potential for systemic risk.

​

​

The Role of AI Tools

AI tools can significantly impact the cryptocurrency market, including Bitcoin. Here are some ways AI is used:

• Price Prediction: AI algorithms can analyze historical data and market trends to predict future price movements.

• Sentiment Analysis: AI can monitor social media and news sentiment to gauge market sentiment and potential price trends.

• Trading Bots: Automated trading bots powered by AI can execute trades based on predefined algorithms and signals.

• Fraud Detection: AI can help detect fraudulent activities and scams in the cryptocurrency market.

 

Overall, the growing involvement of institutions and AI tools in the Bitcoin market presents both opportunities and challenges. While it can bring increased legitimacy, stability, and innovation, it also raises concerns about centralization, regulation, and potential manipulation. The long-term impact of these trends will depend on how they evolve and are managed.

​

----------------

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​